Skip to content
  • Home
  • Bitcoin
  • Business
  • Blockchain

Copyright the voice of money 2026 | Theme by ThemeinProgress | Proudly powered by WordPress

the voice of money
  • Home
  • Bitcoin
  • Business
  • Blockchain
Bitcoin Article

Ledger CTO Warns Bitcoin Quantum Migration Could Take Years as SHRINCS Emerges

On September 17, 2026 by voice

  • Ledger CTO Charles Guillemet published a technical analysis on September 16, 2026, evaluating the SHRINCS post-quantum signature proposal.
  • The SHRINCS draft specifies signature sizes ranging from 548 to 5,777 bytes, compared to the 64 to 72 bytes seen in current ECDSA and Schnorr schemes.
  • The proposal combines stateful signatures using Flexible XMSS and WOTS+C with a stateless fallback mechanism backed by SHA-256.

Charles Guillemet, Chief Technology Officer at Ledger, warned that the Bitcoin quantum migration is not an immediate hardware threat, but rather a protracted technical coordination challenge that could take years. The statement was issued this Wednesday, September 16, following an evaluation of the SHRINCS improvement proposal.

Through a technical publication, Guillemet noted that the current custody framework relies on digital signatures that would be compromised by a cryptographically relevant quantum computer. A source reported that the specialist argued waiting for such hardware to emerge would represent an operational risk, given the extensive timeline required for research, testing, and network-wide deployment.

The evaluated framework, designated as SHRINCS, is a draft Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) authored by Conduition, Ethan Heilman, Mikhail Kudinov, Oleksandr Kurbatov, Jonas Nick, and remix7531.

The architecture relies exclusively on hash functions based on SHA-256, the network’s native algorithm. According to Guillemet’s analysis, this design avoids introducing additional hardness assumptions—such as lattice-based cryptography—and targets Category 1 security under the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards.

The draft’s technical specifications establish a 48-byte public key. In contrast to Bitcoin’s current space efficiency, stateful signatures range between 548 and 4,619 bytes, while the stateless fallback signature reaches 5,777 bytes.

Technical Challenges of SHRINCS and Wallet Management

Implementing this scheme introduces unprecedented operational requirements for custodial software and hardware. Based on technical data examined by Guillemet, the compact pathway uses one-time keys structured in a Merkle tree, requiring the signer to maintain a persistent counter that never rolls back.

An accidental backup restore or concurrent signing event could trigger cryptographic slot reuse, enabling third-party signature forgery. In the event of state desynchronization or data loss, the seed phrase can generate a 5,777-byte stateless signature, shifting the trade-off toward block space consumption rather than fund loss.

Furthermore, findings in the analysis suggest that hash-based key generation and stateless signature computation could take several minutes on contemporary secure hardware devices.

The model also fails to preserve unhardened derivation under BIP32 or the compact threshold signature schemes native to Schnorr. Nevertheless, per-byte verification is computationally lighter than BIP340 Schnorr, as it consists primarily of SHA-256 operations. The executive noted that larger transaction sizes will directly impact network bandwidth, storage overhead, and the ability of everyday users to operate full nodes.

Beyond algorithmic parameters, the transition presents major community governance dilemmas. According to the report, achieving social consensus on the fate of dormant coins whose public keys have never been exposed to the blockchain looms as a far more complex hurdle than selecting the mathematical standard itself.

Alongside this infrastructure debate, Ledger continues to navigate legal challenges following a class-action lawsuit filed on August 27, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:26-cv-07307-VM), where plaintiffs seek at least $500 million in damages tied to prior data breaches. Technical discussions surrounding the SHRINCS draft will continue across Bitcoin developer mailing lists, pending formal reviews of its security proofs.

You may also like

Bitcoin Eyes $80K After 4H Bullish Shift: Will BTC Retest FVG First?

Bitcoin rebounds to $77.4K despite $746M ETF outflows: can BTC break $78K

Bitcoin price breaks channel as RSI climbs to 63

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Archives

  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • December 2019

Calendar

September 2026
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Aug    

Categories

  • AI
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Business
  • Markets

Archives

  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • December 2019

Categories

  • AI
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Business
  • Markets

Copyright the voice of money 2026 | Theme by ThemeinProgress | Proudly powered by WordPress