Skip to content
  • Home
  • Bitcoin
  • Business
  • Blockchain

Copyright the voice of money 2026 | Theme by ThemeinProgress | Proudly powered by WordPress

the voice of money
  • Home
  • Bitcoin
  • Business
  • Blockchain
Blockchain Article

Corporations don’t care about your blockchain

On August 16, 2025 by voice

image

This is a segment from the Lightspeed newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.


We learned this week that Stripe and Circle are planning to launch their own L1 chains.

Ethereum community members were quick to question why corporations shouldn’t launch L2s instead.

Ethan Buchman has a simple explanation: Vertical integration is profitable.

Christian Catalini of Lightspark echoes this view in Forbes:

“… stablecoin issuers have strong incentives either to commoditize the rails — by issuing on multiple networks and positioning themselves at the center of interoperability across them — or to nudge most activity to a network they control. Either strategy gives them a shot at becoming massive global fintech leaders and capturing most of the value the technology creates.”

Circle/Stripe is doing simply what’s best for them. But that means these new chains aren’t contributing to Ethereum data availability fees, which does not elevate the bags of ETH token holders.

The team behind Phantom wallet faced similar “chain alignment” questions upon announcing its integration of Hyperliquid perps.

This as opposed to a perps DEX built on Solana like Drift or Jupiter.

Reasoning from a viewpoint of chain tribalism is pretty standard fare in this industry. But from an outsider’s perspective, it’s probably a very weird mental model to make decisions from. Builders should simply do whatever’s best for business.

Brandon Millman, CEO of Phantom, puts it plainly on this week’s Lightspeed podcast:

“In the world of trading and perps, how do we get the best prices for users? If you just look at the objective numbers, price, execution, liquidity…all of that is an order of magnitude greater on Hyperliquid. And so by completely ignoring that, I think we would’ve been doing a pretty big disservice to users.”

To put it another way, Hyperliquid processed $371 billion in volumes over the last 30 days. Solana’s two largest perp DEXs, Jupiter and Drift, processed a collective $52 billion over the same time.

That’s roughly 7.1x more addressable volume, which should lead to a pretty straightforward business decision.

From my time speaking to application developers in the industry, most pursue a multichain strategy simply because it’s best for business.

Loading Tweet..

You may also like

Hyperliquid Leads Monthly Blockchain Inflows With $616M Surge

Is Mastercard embracing crypto or trying to contain it?

POAP Moves to Maintenance Mode as Founders Eye Next Generation of Digital Collectibles

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • January 2024
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • January 2021

Calendar

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb    

Categories

  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Business
  • Markets

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • January 2024
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • January 2021

Categories

  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Business
  • Markets

Copyright the voice of money 2026 | Theme by ThemeinProgress | Proudly powered by WordPress